THE Media keeps repeating  that Russia hacked the dem site even tho Wiki says that the info was given to them by a dem insider.  CIA doesn’t say they have proof, only that Putin would have to have directed the “leak”.  Doesn’t this sound like propaganda directed at de-legitimizing Trump’s victory?  Doesn’t this show that most media are only repeating the Talking Points  that are given to them daily?  Who is the news person that first spouts the propaganda today?  Podesta presents us with the list to choose from.  If it was me, I would want to vilify the “leaker” (unproven) to distract from the content of the “leaks”.  So why not focus on the content?  Because it proves the lack of character of not just Hillary but also the leadership of the Democrat Party.  Now it is stated that our Constitution is defective, obsolete,  unfair, written by racists, etc. I must be changed or even discarded so that the mob rules.  But that is why we are a constitutional Republic. So that rule of law follows the Bill of Rights.  If Hillary Clinton was elected, she would have appointed SCOTUS that would continue to disregard not only the intent but also the letter of the law.  Democratic vote of nine Justices who would rule by emotion.  The current president uses his czars to pretend that there is credibility to the hacking theory.  Federalist Paper 68 (Hamilton) : “The process of election affords a moral certainty, that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man (or woman) who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.”  That is why Trump won.  It took too much ignoring and/or pretending to vote for Hillary.  The bandwagon didn’t work this year and there weren’t enough “victims”

 

Share PatroitismShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Reddit0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Tumblr0Digg thisBuffer this pagePrint this pageEmail this to someoneFlattr the author